There is much talk, nowadays about allowing ones
children to choose their own faith and not to impose ones own faith upon
them. Personally, I think that line of thought is rubbish, as a child, a
teen, or even some young people cannot think
clearly or deeply enough to work through all of those implications.
But that is not the point of this post.
My question is more one of expectations. When we
consider our own level of maturity, both mentally and spiritually, how
often do we contrast “that” level with the level of the child we are
raising? Is it reasonable, at all, to expect
our children to understand or embrace the spirituality of our
particular point in life, in the same manner as we? Why would an
immature child even be close to our level of maturity when they have
been “at it” for a far shorter time than we? Yes, there is
the very real aspect of influence and practice, to which they have been
exposed, which differs from our own (often times), but there is still
the reality of this little person growing up, and having a personality
of their own, that will influence them.
What is the point here? Our children are not us,
they are their own people and they therefore need to embrace the faith
for themselves. It is our responsibility to raise them as faithfully
and consistently as we can, despite our own shortcoming
and sinfulness. Our sins will affect our children. We must determine
how we can minimize this as much as possible. We need to communicate to
our children that our success or failures in living the Christian life
must not be the standard by which to judge
the validity or value of the Christian faith. We must communicate the
perfection of Jesus Christ and make that the model to emulate.
No comments:
Post a Comment