When we speak of the church, are we
talking about the local church, that is, a particular congregation, or the
universal church, that is, all local congregations, over all time, in all
places? When we say "all", in
this regard, who is included in this? Do
we include all those who call themselves Christians? Do we only include those who meet specific
doctrinal criteria? Do we only include
those who are actually in communion with a particular ecclesial body?
To what authority do we appeal to
make his definition? Much of the problem
stems from the Protestant Reformation and the framework of thinking that has
been constructed since then. The option to think and act independently of an
ecclesial authority must be questioned. Is there any other "body"
which allows for independent action?
Certainly not any organic body. If you remove your spleen, it will not
survive and function on its own. This is a valid analogy, as Paul compares the
body of Christ to the human body. If nothing in the human body can survive
outside of its body and independent of it, why would we think any different of
the body of Christ?
The question then leads to how we
define church. This has been a problem since the Protestant Reformation. With
Luther and Calvin's decisive break from the organized church (albeit the Roman
Catholic church, who themselves are out of communion with the historic church),
they set a precedent that has exploded into many thousands of denominations,
each answering for itself the multitude of doctrinal, ecclesiastical and
practical answers.
The Orthodox Church would argue
that church would be defined in a very practical, historic sense, that is, the
church is those who are in communion with the practicing apostolic faith. Of
course, that faith is found in the Orthodox Church and no where else. This is
not to say that, in some mysterious sense, there are no Christians outside of
the Orthodox Church, in the same way that there were odd exceptions under the
Old Covenant. For example, Naaman did not take on the mark of covenantal
inclusion i.e., circumcision, yet he was still a follower of YHWH. But this
ought to be seen as an unusual and rare situation. In today’s context, are
there Christians outside of the Orthodox Church? Absolutely!
But I have to ask, why would someone choose that position? Why would someone prefer to stay on the
practical "outside" of daily communion with God and his people?
So what is "the
Church"? It is the body of Christ,
as manifested by the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you profess the name of
Christ, then you ought to be there as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment